🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.